HOME
|
MEA CULPA |
GIVE THE GOP A LANDSLIDE VICTORY |
THE ELEPHANT, THE ROOM, AND THE
PEOPLE
PART II |
THE ELEPHANT, THE ROOM, AND THE PEOPLE
PART I |
MONEY GRUBBING FEMALES, UNITE! |
WE AREN’T ELECTING A HOMECOMING QUEEN |
DESPERATELY SEEKING SUSAN |
THE TOOTSIE ISSUE |
Toddlers 4 President! |
CRYING BABIES AND OTHER PRESSING
MATTERS OF STATE |
Democratic Convention 2016: How It
Might Have Been |
I’D LIKE TO FEEL THE BERN,
ONLY…
|
AN UNFORTUNATE REMEMBRANCE
OF THINGS PAST
|
On Matters of the Lie, the
War, and Judgment |
EGO, POLITICS, AND THE
PRESIDENCY |
On Getting What We Deserve |
HOW JANUARY 2017 WILL LOOK |
Return
to Main Website |
|
|
DESPERATELY SEEKING SUSAN
At one point during the
contentious Democratic primary, actress Susan Sarandon commented
nationally that “some of Bernie Sanders’ supporters” would probably
vote for Trump if Mr. Sanders did not win the nomination because
that would “bring on the revolution” more speedily. These months
later, having been witness to Mr. Trump’s style of campaigning, to
his associates and their philosophies, to the falsehoods and
distortions of the truth that Mr. Trump has spoken or tweeted, to
the contempt with which Mr. Trump has treated entire ethnic groups
(not to mention his own supporters) I find myself wondering if Ms
Sarandon would like to stand up and be counted as a patriot now. A
patriot personifies Country First, not “my way or the highway.” Of
course, for Ms Sarandon to do this, she would have to apologize for
something said in the heat of whatever-it-was-she-was-feeling in
that moment. She would also have to say “I was wrong.” She would
also have to encourage those people who want to cast a protest vote
to vote, instead, in a manner guaranteed to defeat the most
dangerous man who has ever run for the Presidency of our country.
The only problem is…I’m not sure Susan Sarandon is a patriot. If she
were, I expect we’d have seen her long ago doing everything on earth
that she could do to make certain Donald Trump is not elected to the
Presidency.
I have watched this election unfolding since June 2015, and it’s no
surprise to me that the GOP has ended up with an unashamed
pathological liar as their nominee. I don’t say this because I
believe the GOP is filled with such people. I say this because the
GOP stood to one side and let it happen just as the GOP stood to one
side and allowed their party to be taken over by rightwing
extremists, all in name of winning elections. In this, however, the
GOP was assisted by the media who acted the part of Mr. Trump’s
dupes from the moment he called Mexicans seeking a better life in
the US rapists, drug dealers, and other criminals. The media gave
him hours of air time from that moment onward, and Mr. Trump—knowing
that they would do this—played them like fools from the first.
Here’s what he knew: If he dominated every news cycle by making ugly
and outrageous comments—whether they be true or false— he would
garner all the attention to himself, leaving the rest of the GOP
field struggling to get their messages across. Do you know what Jeb
Bush stood for? what Marco Rubio’s plans for America were? what John
Kasich had in mind? Aside from Ted Cruz’s big plan to carpet bomb
wherever ISIS was suspected to be hanging out, was there anything
else you learned about his plans for the country? My guess would be
no. You had very little chance to learn about any of the other
candidates because Donald Trump kept you from learning about them by
defining the narrative of the election in such a way as to make that
narrative seem real. And the media bought it. He cast the line; they
bit; he hauled them ashore. He continues to do that.
During the primary, the narrative was about:
Lying Ted Cruz
Little Marco Rubio
Low energy Jeb Bush
The wall, the wall, the wall (Mexico will “pay” for this, of course,
because Donald will simply tell the contractors to send Mexico their
bills if they wish to be paid once they’ve finished their labors.
Mexico, of course, who did not hire them, will not pay. The
contractors will lose out, but that’s how Donald has done business
for decades.)
Ugly Carly Fiorino
My standing in the polls my standing in the polls, my standing in
the polls
Crooked Hillary
During the general election, he is doing the same. He knows that if
he can dominate the 24 hour news cycle every day—and differently
from the day before—two of his purposes will be achieved: He will
keep the media from featuring his opponent and her proposals for the
country and he will also keep the media from looking more deeply
into him. He is doing this because it has so far worked. Why mess
with success?
One example of digging that might have been done at some point was a
strong look at Mr. Trump’s charitable foundation. That look would
have revealed that the main charity to which Mr. Trump’s foundation
gives is Mr. Trump. This is absolutely illegal. This is court
worthy. But who has the time to dig into this bit of Mr. Trump’s
life when instead it’s more fascinating to air footage of him
accusing Hillary Clinton of being the person who first questioned
President Obama’s place of birth. This, of course, was an outright
lie, but truth is not important to Mr. Trump. What is important is
defining the narrative of the election every single day. If he can
do that—as he has done—then he controls a process that should have
been about vetting him from June 2015 onward but has instead been
about infotainment in the pursuit of ratings.
Witness his recent announcement that Lester Holt—the moderator of
the first Presidential debate—is a Democrat. Mr. Holt is a
registered Republican as things turn out, but the seed has been
planted so if Mr. Holt questions Mr. Trump with too much vigor, it
will be because he’s a Democrat and not because Mr. Trump either has
something to hide or doesn’t know a thing about the question he’s
been asked.
Mr. Trump knows his audience well. He sees them as people who do not
read newspapers or news magazines, who follow twitter as one of
their main sources of information, who watch reality television of
the Housewives of Wherever ilk, who know nothing about the country’s
history, who watch Fox News to learn what is going on in the country
and the world, and who see him—as a well-dressed woman on a flight
from Frankfurt was heard saying just this last week—as “a good guy”
or, more ridiculously, “just like us.”
Mr. Trump is not like us. He is sui generis. He is a man who has
made money by selling his name to be plunked on buildings which he
himself had no hand in building around the globe. He is a brand; he
is not a leader. But he has led millions of people down a merry path
toward perdition through pretense and outright prevarication. If he
is allowed to continue defining the narrative of the election as he
has done so far, there is a very good chance he will be elected
President of the United States.
He is a man without dignity, a man without intelligence, a man
without conscience, a man without heart. He has shown this from the
moment he first opened his mouth. He is no patriot, and he wouldn’t
know what patriotism even is. To vote for him as President for any
reason is akin to casting the country into the void.
I earnestly pray that does not happen. More and more, though, I
think it will.
- Elizabeth George
Whidbey Island
Washington State
|
|