HOME
|
MEA CULPA |
GIVE THE GOP A LANDSLIDE VICTORY |
THE ELEPHANT, THE ROOM, AND THE
PEOPLE
PART II |
THE ELEPHANT, THE ROOM, AND THE PEOPLE
PART I |
MONEY GRUBBING FEMALES, UNITE! |
WE AREN’T ELECTING A HOMECOMING QUEEN |
DESPERATELY SEEKING SUSAN |
THE TOOTSIE ISSUE |
Toddlers 4 President! |
CRYING BABIES AND OTHER PRESSING
MATTERS OF STATE |
Democratic Convention 2016: How It
Might Have Been |
I’D LIKE TO FEEL THE BERN,
ONLY…
|
AN UNFORTUNATE REMEMBRANCE
OF THINGS PAST
|
On Matters of the Lie, the
War, and Judgment |
EGO, POLITICS, AND THE
PRESIDENCY |
On Getting What We Deserve |
HOW JANUARY 2017 WILL LOOK |
Return
to Main Website |
|
|
CRYING BABIES AND OTHER PRESSING MATTERS OF STATE
When Donald Trump asked the mother of the crying baby to remove
herself and the infant from his rally last week, he created another
news story to be added to the massive number he’s prompted in the
last twelve or thirteen months. To the growing list of individuals
and groups that the GOP’s candidate for President appeared not to be
able to tolerate in his world were added babes in arms. In the usual
chatter of talking heads afterwards, the story became synonymous
with Mr. Trump’s apparent inability to stay on message as well as
his propensity for shooting from the hip, which has apparently
endeared him to a significant number of his followers, who have
called it “not being politically correct” and who have also seemed
to delight in it.
If interrupting himself mid-speech to deal with a crying baby were
only an indication of shooting from the hip or being politically
incorrect, that would be a minor consideration in the greater scheme
of Donald Trump’s campaign for President. But the request—when
considered along with other spontaneous pronouncements at various
rallies around the country—suggests something else about the
candidate, and it might be a good idea for the public to take a look
at what that is.
Talking heads of various professions and of both major political
parties seemed to have concentrated on several questions:
Why can’t he stay on message?
Why does he say the outrageous things he says?
Why won’t he “pivot” (for that you can read “change into someone
more acceptable by announcing more reasonable and achievable
goals”)?
Why does he seem to be constitutionally incapable of letting go of
grievances?
Why does he offend the very people whose support he needs?
Most people see him as a narcissist and while this appears to be
true, what’s also appears to be true is that he can’t do any of the
things that are expected of him not only for psychological reasons
but also for reasons that may well have to do with his brain and how
it does and doesn’t function.
Whether you like Donald Trump or despise Donald Trump, whether you
are a Republican, a Democratic, a Libertarian, a member of the Green
Party, or an independent, it might be a good idea to see what Donald
Trump’s brain is suggesting about Donald Trump before you go into
the voting booth in November.
After all these months of all-Donald-all-the-time on the television
news, it seems to me that Donald Trump’s brain might not be
functioning the way it should function. Call it ADD or ADHD or an
impairment in the executive function capability of the brain, what
seems to be happening with Donald Trump is that he lacks cognitive
control, which makes it impossible for him to stay on task, whether
that task is simply to speak to people or to organize an effective
campaign. He is unable to tune things out—such as a crying baby—as
other people are able to tune things out. His brain malfunctions in
such a way that he lacks the normal inhibitions that govern the
behavior of people with a normal brain function. Hence he is unable
to stop himself when he begins to rev up to an idea that has just
occurred to him. For this reason, his off-the-cuff remarks have
contained everything from misinformation to outright lies, from
promises that can’t be kept to delusions that have the ring of
possibility, from spontaneous declarations of his admiration for
proven dictators to in-the-moment lies about his opponents, about
the economy, about President Obama’s record.
The real problem in all of this is that Donald Trump doesn’t seem to
be aware of the manner in which his brain is clicking along on a
wandering track. Were he aware of it, he might be able to do
something about it. Additionally, his support team in the race for
President also seem to be unaware of what’s happening inside their
candidate’s head. So they continue to give him everything from pep
talks to talking points, and they hope the intervention of his
children will prove effective in altering his behavior.
It’s my belief that the way Donald Trump’s brain functions is one of
the critical reasons that he should not be elected President of the
United States. A President’s brain needs to be firing on all
cylinders and firing well. It needs to be able to focus and to
execute, to gather information and to retain it, to problem solve
with the involvement of others and to inhibit spontaneous
inclinations that lead to remarks and behaviors causing problems
rather than solving them.
Most classroom teachers know from experience that when someone has a
brain that isn’t working as brains are meant to work and when that
person receives no assistance for this problem, what develops is a
set of coping skills to disguise the difficulties that their brains
cause them. In Donald Trump’s case, we’ve seen this in the early
part of his campaign when he dodged real political issues in favor
of identifying his opposition through the use of a pejorative term
or a pejorative phrase directed at other candidates. These he
repeated often enough to coax each one into defining not only the
narrative of the race but also the individual to whom the term or
phrase was applied. Hence, Mr. Trump regularly mocked Jeb Bush for
his “lack of energy”, which allowed the former governor’s narrative
to be not about his experience and the positions he took on various
issues but rather about the forcefulness with which he spoke. Once
Mr. Bush was disposed of as a candidate, Mr. Trump moved on and
systematically defined each of his other opponents until his
definition of them became the reality of who they were. My guess is
that Mr. Trump learned this—among the other behaviors we’ve seen—as
a child, using it as a way to cope with a brain that wasn’t
functioning normally.
Voters have to ask themselves if the evidence they have witnessed
with their own eyes and ears shows them an individual whose brain is
capable of taking on the unimaginable burdens of the Presidency. In
my opinion, Mr. Trump’s brain is one of the primary reasons he
should not gain entrance to the Oval Office. For this election—as
bizarre as it has been—will place into a position of worldwide
influence an individual who must be firing on all cylinders as those
cylinders are meant to be firing. The individual must be a detail
person, someone who can organize, someone who can listen to a passel
of opinions and sift through them to find the grains of truth,
someone who can assemble a team of talented, skilled, and
experienced men and women in whom the President can place absolute
confidence, someone who can cope with and deal with the endless and
entirely unexpected distractions that demand attention on a daily
basis.
It is my belief that Donald Trump’s brain does not allow him to be
that person. Whether you love him or hate him, I encourage you,
before Election Day, to weigh carefully what you have seen of him
and heard from him since the moment he stepped onto the national
political stage, in order to decide if he ought to be given the
power, prestige, and authority that go with the Presidency.
- Elizabeth George
Whidbey Island
Washington State
|
|